Polystearolmonocylibrium #17

What is this stuff, polystearolmonocylibrium #17? I have no idea. Nothing I’d want to put in my mouth, over my kids, or around my garden. Must be some chemical-mineral concoction brewed up at a secret laboratory in the bowels of Los Alamos. Number 17 yet – sheesh, they made an awful lot of mistakes getting to the one potion they liked well enough to put on the market. Hope they know what they’re doing – hope they know what polystearolmonocylibrium #17 does!

Thing is, I’ve read wanna-be books – books whose authors hope they are on the road to publication – that are as knowledgeable about aspects of incidents in their stories as you are about polystearolmonocylibrium. Which means they’ve written rubbish. Writers can’t write what they don’t know about. Those who do present themselves as false, pretentious, foolish. Readers won’t put up with deception. Rule number one, or someplace near the top of the list: write what you know.

talkingWere I to write only about what I know from personal experience, my work would be a few hundred pages of everyday observations. Best dusting techniques when guests are arriving in half an hour – focus on what shows, skip the back of the shelves. Shortest driving route up the California coast – the inland 5 Freeway which is flat and hot and unbelievably gets flatter and hotter. Discovery that California Highway Patrol does not take reports about minor surface-street accidents – non-freeway fender benders are the jurisdiction of the California Sheriff. I haven’t lived in a war zone, been kidnapped by desperadoes, invented anything of worth, or lived the life of a space pioneer, so my first hand experiences are limited to these kinds of mundane activities. So, how can I write about spectacular events from my ordinary armchair?

Here are snippets about how the experts approach fiction. Barbara Kingsolver researched the mudslide catastrophe of the Mexican village of Angangueo, Mexico, where the monarch butterflies migrate every year. She also studied with a dedicated biology team to combine the real peril of climate change with an imaginative take on biological adaptability to write Flight Behavior. One of the most striking images of her book is that of a forest on fire with the orange flicker of monarchs that have alighted thousands of miles off course in an impoverished community seeking a miracle. Readers cheered for the butterflies to thrive in their new home, for the townspeople to find something of value in themselves, for global warming to reverse.

Charles Frazier modified with great license his knowledge of the life of his uncle, William P. Inman, a Civil War veteran, blending the history of the Appalachians in the mid 1800’s with a story of betrayal and redemption to write the Civil War book, Cold Mountain. Frazier even attended a fiddler’s convention, and his passages about music sound like the work of a master musician. His feel for the people of the mountain, their culture and language, lends the story true breath. Readers ache for the plight of Inman, Ada, and Ruby, and the mad injustices of war.

Geraldine Brooks studied, under the careful supervision of museum attendants, the actual Sarajevo Haggadah to write People of the Book, merging her observations of the actual illuminated 14th century manuscript with her imagination to create a story that sounds completely plausible, reads with much insight about the medieval artists who may have made the book, and the Bosnian museum director who protected it from the Nazis. To follow Brooks’ tale is to enter a world of artists and scholars, of piety and peril. Readers touch the lives of people escaping conflict or creating sanctuary.

From these talented and brilliant writers I learned a great deal, first of all accepting how little I knew. Research has become the pillar of my writing, as it is for these professional, oft published, and highly acclaimed writers. Learning about unfamiliar skills and historical events lends, if not the brilliance of Kingsolver, Frazier, Brooks, at least the shine of verity to my work.

I attended a lecture and demonstration at the Getty Museum to learn about the craft of marquetry, then spent hours at their detailed marquetry exhibit, taking notes on all the steps involved in the process. Later I read several articles and sought examples of this lovely work everywhere, and spent time with a wood carver who demonstrated additional skills. This knowledge of woodworking is essential to one of my novels, The Inlaid Table.

I interviewed a friend who’d lived through a fire that devastated a Southern California neighborhood decades ago. For many hours she shared the day that the fire raged through Lemon Heights, and told me a few details only a first person account could reveal. She’d also saved every newspaper article about the fire and let me borrow them. I read the papers carefully and took notes, corroborated events with maps, working the facts into the fiction of my story, The Tree House Mother.

I’ve read numerous books about Alzheimer’s, attended discussions with people whose families are struggling because a member has the disease, and listened attentively to the lectures of physicians and researchers engaged in the cutting edge discoveries that may lead to a cure. I’ve also sat many hours with people whose lives teeter in the strange vacuum of the disease, and found both dignity and craziness. What I understand of this illness rests at the heart of my book, Where Did Mama Go?

When I began writing each of these books, I knew I would have to find out more than the general knowledge and limited experience I had of specific items or historic eras. What I now know makes my stories read authentically, a frequent comment from readers. That’s what knowing your subject gets for you – a reader who believes.

I did invent one thing: the word Polystearolmonocylibrium. According to Google: “Your search – Polystearolmonocylibrium – did not match any documents.” I could research the Latin roots of the parts of the word, though ultimately it’s nonsense and means nothing. My writing means everything. Yours must as well.



16 thoughts on “Polystearolmonocylibrium #17

  1. I like all the affixes in your word. It makes it believable–which is how you make your stories sound true, too. You start with a real core and build.

    Good post, Shari.

  2. Thank you, Jacqui. I had fun creating the “word” and was pleased that Google found it as ridiculous as I did.

  3. Excellent! Your writing definitely reflects your advice.

  4. I tried to look up the word, polystearolmonocylibrium. So far it doesn’t exist. That doesn’t mean it won’t be a recognized word in a dictionary tomorrow though.

    I’m at the end of my 1st draft of my first book. It’s definitely rubbish at this point. I’m amazed at the number of so-called writers/authors who assume their work is ready for the public before proper editing is done and professional opinions are shared. Books aren’t just whipped up.

  5. That’s funny, Glynis, that you tried to look up the word. I had fun creating it and made sure I hadn’t accidentally borrowed the word instead.

    I absolutely agree with you about how much work it takes to write a decent book, but computers and self publishing have made it possible to produce sour hard apples. There are well written books in the self-pubbed aisle and rubbish in the traditional aisle also, but my personal goal is to write well. Seems like it’s yours too. Best wishes as you continue to fine tune your book.

  6. I love it. Sometime it just takes one good idea to be able to build out a whole story.

  7. yes. i ‘steal’ details from my real life to build characters that are realistic… and then i have to worry my friends will think those characters are based on them when they’re really not!

  8. Well you convinced me it’s real. Ever considered writing a small “dictionary” with more of these words and their “definitions?” 🙂

  9. Yes, Lyn, I can and so can you – take it syllable by syllable. LOL!

  10. I’m a great believer in ‘write what you know’ but tend to get shouted down by other authors about this subject at times. The key to an authentic book is in the detail. None of my characters have gone over Niagara Falls in a barrel, but if they did I’d research the experience to within an inch of it’s life before writing about it.
    I love your made up word – my first impression was it may have been the fabric of the new ‘invisibility cloak’ that is being tested at the moment 🙂

  11. Well, Dianne, if you have any contact with the testing team, please let them know the name is available for purchase for a very reasonable price. 😀

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.